Policy Matters: Fragmentation, censorship and political surveillance of Internet among risks in global debate on governance

Governance issues over the evolution of Internet technology, resources, protocols and standards will play an increasingly important role in global debates

News | CIOL Bureau

WATERLOO, CANADA: Governance issues over the evolution of Internet technology, resources, protocols and standards will play an increasingly important role in global debates, according to a new report issued by The Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI).

In Internet Points of Control as Global Governance, CIGI senior fellow, Laura DeNardis explores key Internet governance issues that will have profound impact on global public policy discussions in coming years. She says that government involvement in regulating or facilitating Internet interconnection through a payment model, for example, would be a departure from the current governance approach and could "fragment the Internet based on political manipulation."

DeNardis says this change "Could present a range of unintended or intended consequences - such as creating new concentrated points for government censorship, surveillance and politically motivated interconnection blockages, or creating economic disincentives for major content companies."

DeNardis also points out the consequences that could come from having the Domain Name System (DNS) play a larger role in content control. Noting that this approach is already used for censorship in repressive contexts and in the United States for intellectual property rights enforcement, DeNardis says, "This practice would be controversial because it would fragment the Internet's universality depending on country and possibly create security and stability challenges to the DNS."

The report, which outlines the critical Internet resources at play within the larger architecture ensuring a universal system, stresses that the technical standards, as esoteric as they are, can have a real economic and political impact, and "to a certain extent, enact public policy in areas that are traditionally carried out by governments."

DeNardis says: "They are the infrastructural foundations for global trade and the digital public sphere, but their design and constitution create public policy in areas as politically charged as privacy, accessibility and other individual civil liberties. The policy implications of Internet standards raise the obvious governance question of how these standards are procedurally established and by whom."

Source: http://www.ciol.com/ciol/news/193617/fragmentation-censorship-political-surveillance-internet-risks-global-debate-governance